1805P Efficacy of olaparib (ola) + abiraterone (abi) vs placebo (pbo) + abi in the non-BRCA mutation (non-BRCAm) subgroup of patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCPRC) in the PROpel trial

N. Mehra,N.W. Clarke,A.J. Armstrong,M. Oya,N.D. Shore,G. Procopio, J.D.C. Guedes,C. Arslan, F. Parnis,E. Brown,F. Schlürmann, J.Y. Joung, M. Sugimoto,Y.D. Choi, D. Castellano,Y. Urun, C. Hosius, C. Desai,A. Degboe,F. Saad

Annals of Oncology(2023)

引用 1|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
PROpel (NCT03732820) met its primary endpoint with a significant investigator-assessed radiographic progression-free survival (IA rPFS) benefit with ola + abi vs pbo + abi in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population in first-line mCRPC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54–0.81; P<0.001). At final pre-specified analysis there was a trend to improved overall survival (OS) with ola + abi vs pbo + abi (median 42.1 vs 34.7 months [m]; HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67–1.00; P=0.0544). The greatest magnitude of benefits was seen in the BRCAm subgroup. Post hoc exploratory analyses were conducted to further investigate outcomes in non-BRCAm pts. PROpel was a phase 3 double-blind trial. Pts were enrolled irrespective of biomarker status and randomized 1:1 to receive ola (300 mg twice daily [bid]) or pbo, and abi (1000 mg once daily) + prednisone/prednisolone (5 mg bid). Treatment continued until radiographic disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Aggregated tumour tissue (FoundationOne®CDx) and ctDNA (FoundationOne®Liquid CDx) test results, performed after randomization and before primary analysis, were used to classify pt mutation status. Non-BRCAm pts had no positive BRCAm test result and at least 1 negative BRCAm tissue or ctDNA result. In the non-BRCAm subgroup (n=693), there was a meaningful clinical benefit across endpoints for pts treated with ola + abi (Table). Safety profile of the combination was consistent with the ITT population. Within the non-BRCAm subgroup, analyses by baseline clinical characteristics showed consistent effect and will be presented.Table: 1805PNon-BRCAmOla + abi (n=343)Pbo + abi (n=350)HR (95% CI)Median (m):IA rPFS*24.119.00.76 (0.61–0.94)BICR rPFS*27.616.60.72 (0.58–0.90)OS†39.638.00.91 (0.73–1.13)Median time to (m):PSA progression*22.113.10.63 (0.50–0.79)First subsequent therapy†24.019.90.84 (0.70–1.01)First cytotoxic chemotherapy†30.122.70.80 (0.66–0.97)Second progression or death†NCNC0.86 (0.65–1.14)PSA 50 response,* %78.671.4ORR,* %51.145.4FACT-P change from baseline†-6.3-5.3Any AE of CTCAE Grade ≥3,† %57.043.7Any AE with outcome of death, † %7.04.9*DCO1; 30/7/21 †DCO3; 12/10/22 AE, adverse event; DCO, data cutoff; NC, not calculable; ORR, objective response rate; PSA, prostate-specific antigen Open table in a new tab *DCO1; 30/7/21 †DCO3; 12/10/22 AE, adverse event; DCO, data cutoff; NC, not calculable; ORR, objective response rate; PSA, prostate-specific antigen Exploratory analyses across multiple endpoints support a clinically meaningful benefit with ola + abi vs pbo + abi in non-BRCAm pts and a safety profile consistent with the overall ITT population.
更多
查看译文
关键词
prostate cancer,olaparib,pbo,non-brcam,castration-resistant
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要