Aneuploidy in oocytes of women of advanced maternal age: impact on embryo development and evidence for a novel mechanism of meiotic error

Abstract Study question In oocytes of advanced maternal age (AMA) women, what is the association of aneuploidy with embryo development and what are the mechanisms leading to aneuploidy? Summary answer We confirmed precocious separation of sister chromatids as the main cause of aneuploidy. Known chromosome segregation errors explained 90.4% of the observed abnormal chromosome copy numbers in polar bodies. What is known already Meiotic chromosomal aneuploidies in oocytes correlate with AMA (>35 years), and can affect over half of oocytes in this age group. This underlies the rationale for polar body (PB) biopsy as a form of early PGT-A, as performed in the ‘ESHRE STudy into the Evaluation of oocyte Euploidy by Microarray analysis’ (ESTEEM) randomised controlled trial (RCT). So far, chromosome analysis of oocytes and PBs has shown that precocious separation of sister chromatids (PSSC), meiosis II (MII) nondisjunction (ND) and reverse segregation (RS) are the main mechanisms leading to aneuploidy in oocytes. Study design, size, duration Data was sourced from the ESTEEM study, a multicentre RCT from seven European centres to assess the clinical utility of PGT-A on PBs using array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) in patients of AMA (36-40 years). This included data on the chromosome complement in PB pairs, and on embryo morphology in a subset of embryos, up to day 6 post insemination (dpi), from both the intervention (PB biopsy for PGT-A) and from control (no biopsy) arms. Participants/materials, setting, methods ESTEEM recruited 396 AMA patients: 205 in the intervention group and 191 in the control group. Complete genetic data from 693 PB pairs were analysed. Additionally, the morphology from 1034 embryos generated from fertilized oocytes (2 pronuclei) in the PB biopsy group and 1082 in the control group were compared using age-adjusted multilevel mixed-effect ordinal logistic regression for each day of embryo scoring and summarized with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Main results and the role of chance Overall, 461/693 PB pairs showed abnormal segregation in 1162/10810 chromosomes. The main observed abnormal segregations were compatible with PSSC in meiosis I (MI) (n = 568/1162; 48,9%), ND of chromatids in MII or RS (n = 417/1162; 35.9%) and less frequently ND in MI (n = 65/1162; 5.6%). For 112 chromosomes (112/1162; 9,6%), we observed a chromosome copy number in PB1 and PB2 that is not explained by any of the known mechanisms causing aneuploidy in oocytes. We observed that embryos in the PGT-A arm of the RCT did not have a significantly different morphology between 2 and 6 dpi compared to the control group, indicating that polar body biopsy did not affect embryo quality. Following age-adjusted multilevel mixed-effect ordinal logistic regression models performed for each embryo evaluation day (using the before-mentioned embryo scoring subcategories), aneuploidy was associated with a decrease in embryo quality on day 3 (aOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.90), day 4 (aOR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06-0.39) and day 5 (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.58). Limitations, reason for caution RS cannot be distinguished from normal segregation or MII ND using aCGH. The observed segregations were based on the detected copy number of PB1 and PB2 only and were not confirmed by the analysis of embryos. The embryo morphology assessment was static and single observer. Wider implications of the findings Our finding of frequent unexplained chromosome copy numbers in polar bodies indicates that our knowledge of the mechanisms causing aneuploidy in oocytes is incomplete. It challenges the dogma that aneuploidy in oocytes is exclusively caused by missegregation of chromosomes during meiosis I and II. Study funding/competing interest(s) Data was mined from a study funded by ESHRE. Illumina provided microarrays and other consumables necessary for aCGH testing of polar bodies. None of the authors have competing interests. This work is dedicated to the memory of Professor Joep Geraedts. Trial registration number NCT01532284 Study funding Yes Funding source Funding by national/international organization(s)