Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for copy number variants of uncertain significance (CNV- VUS) in the genomic era: to do or not to do?

Purpose To review cases of couples presented to our PGT-unit with copy number variants (CNVs) classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in order to better understand their needs. Methods Retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary medical-center, 2014–2019. We reviewed files of all couples applying for genetic counseling with CNVs classified as VUS. The main outcomes measured: number of VUS findings and their description, PGT-M procedures planned and performed, IVF cycles, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates (LBR). VUS were classified according to the American-College of Medical-Genetics and Genomics classification at time of first consultation, and updated—December 2018. Results Twenty-four couples presented with a total of 30 VUS. Twelve couples (50%) had isolated VUS and 12 (50%) had VUS diagnosed in addition to a pathogenic mutation. Initially, nine findings (30%) were defined as VUS; eight (27%) as likely benign (b-VUS); and 13 (43%) as likely pathogenic (p-VUS). PGT-M was recommended for 17/30 CNVs (56.6%), 12 (70%) of which, isolated VUS. No couple had other indications for IVF. To date, nine couples performed PGT-M for isolated VUS; LBR per-couple—55.5%. Five couples performed PGT-M for both pathogenic findings and VUS, LBR—80%. After reviewing VUS classifications, 30% remained unchanged, 20% were more severely defined, and 50% less severely defined. Conclusion The genomic era enables detection of VUS whose definition is subject to change as additional information becomes available. The uncertainty of variants’ clinical significance and changes in VUS definition over time complicates genetic counseling. Revised guidelines for VUS interpretation and reevaluation of patient counseling before each pregnancy must be practiced when counseling them regarding the justification of PGT-M for their diagnosed VUS.