Comparison of key sentinel node biopsy parameters for 99mTc-tilmanocept (TcTM) and 99mTc-sulfur colloid (TcSC) in breast cancer
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine(2013)
摘要
126 Objectives Intraoperative lymphatic mapping (ILM) for sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) is conducted with a dye agent and/or a 99mTc-radiotracing agent (RTA). The currently-approved RTAs in the US and Europe for ILM/SLNB are only particulate colloids. TcSC (50-800nm) recently received approval in the US to assist in the localization of lymph nodes draining a primary tumor in pts with BC. TcTM (≤ 7nm) (Lymphoseek; Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Dublin, OH), a novel, soluble, receptor-targeted (CD206) synthetic molecular ILM RTA has been evaluated in two phase 3 studies for BC. To date, no direct comparative clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of TcTM and TcSC. Methods A meta-analysis of data from phase 3 TcTM trials vs TcSC published data identified in US regulatory review was conducted with regard to two key ILM/SLNB performance parameters, localization rate (LR) and degree of localization (DL), so as to construct a performance comparison. The functional endpoints were: 1] LR (% of pts w/ a hot node found) and 2] DL (# of hot nodes found/pt). Both metrics define the potential for RTA performance for ILM/SLNB and potentially for evaluation of nodal metastasis. Results The LR for TcSC was 94% (95% CI = 91.4, 96.0; n=9213). The LR for TcTM was 99.9% (95% CI = 99.2, 100.0; n=148); p Conclusions Based on a meta-analysis of clinical trial data, TcTM provided statistically significantly greater performance than TcSC in the key metrics of lymph node localization/pt, and degree of localization (nodes found/pt) in breast cancer. These data suggest that receptor-targeted TcTM may provide improved diagnostic ILM vs the currently employed nonspecific ILM RTA, TcSC.
更多查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要